Author
Nathan González Mendelejis
Institution
California State University Long Beach
Discipline/Approach...
Abstract
In this piece, Nathan González Mendelejis provides an overview of the combative relationship between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. He argues that structural changes in the Middle East are forcing and will continue to force the two nations to improve their relationship. He describes routes that Iran can take to moderate its stance toward the United States and also provides a number of prescriptions for the consideration of US policymakers.
Author
Michael Buehler
Institution
University of London
Discipline/Approach...
Abstract
The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari’a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari’a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari’a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.
